The nomological argument for the existence of God

According to the Nomological Argument, observed regularities in nature are best explained by an appeal a supernatural being. A successful explanation must avoid two perils. Some explanations provide too little structure, predicting universe without regularities. Others much thereby precluding of certain types lawlike featured modern scientific theories. We argue that based creative, intentional action being avoids these perils whereas leading competitors do not. Although our argument falls short full defense, it does suggest Argument is worthy philosophical attention.